Bloomberg: Moment of truth nears for Ukraine investors riding out turmoil
Investors holding Ukrainian debt are approaching a crucial moment as the country counted among the shakiest emerging markets prepares for a vote that can alleviate a swirling political crisis – or tip the nation deeper into turmoil.
One of the five countries listed by the Institute of International Finance as the most vulnerable to a stronger dollar and rising global interest rates, Ukraine is in the midst of a political upheaval that has the potential to curb its foreign funding. Of the other four, Turkey and Argentina have suffered full-blown currency crises since the study was published a month ago, Bloomberg wrote.
Lawmakers in the capital Kyiv are facing a make-or-break moment as they try to push through legislation required to keep receiving money from the International Monetary Fund. Making matters worse is a public spat between the country's premier and finance minister, two of the key officials working to restore the $17.5 billion aid package. The risk is that investors who are largely ignoring the turmoil at the moment suddenly rush for the exit if things go badly wrong, as happened in both Argentina and Turkey last month.
"Our base case about the anti-corruption court has long been that an eleventh hour compromise with the IMF would be reached and therefore we've looked past all the noise," said Richard Segal, a senior analyst at Manulife Asset Management Ltd. in London who sees more value in notes with a maturity of up to six years.
The crisis could come to a head on Thursday, when lawmakers are due to vote on a bill that would set up an anti-corruption court, one of the conditions of unfreezing the IMF bailout. Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman threatened to quit if they reject it.
The stakes are high for Ukraine, an eastern-European nation with more than $20 billion of outstanding dollar debt, because it hasn't managed to fully replenish its foreign-currency reserves since a sovereign debt crisis three years ago. The balance currently stands at around $18.4 billion, about half of its former level.
"The absence of financial support from official creditors increases the vulnerability of the country's economy and financial market, especially when access to global capital markets is limited," the central bank said in the minutes of last month's rate meeting, published on Monday. Policy makers on May 24 left the benchmark interest rate at 17 percent, Europe's highest.
The rate-setting panel paid special attention to growing risks for developing economies, highlighting Argentina and Turkey, according to the minutes. Failure to restart the flow of IMF funds may trigger more rate hikes and tighter controls on the foreign currency market, the central bank said.
In its note published May 3, the IIF said that Ukraine, China, Argentina, South Africa and Turkey appear most vulnerable to changes in risk appetite due to a combination of relatively high financing needs, less-than-adequate reserves and weak institutions.
High demand for developing-nation debt helped Ukraine to sell $3 billion of dollar bonds last year, pushing back some of the debt burden. A plan to offer another $2 billion this year might prove more difficult because a recent sell-off in emerging markets has pushed up borrowing costs.
Finance Minister Oleksandr Danyliuk, who is lobbying for the anti-corruption bill to be passed, has warned that it will be difficult to tap the market without the IMF funding, which has already been delayed for a year. The minister's future in the government became uncertain last week when his conflict with Groysman over a personnel appointment burst into the public. Danyliuk's predecessor Natalie Jaresko and former Central Bank Governor Valeriya Gontareva left their posts amid political infighting.
"The general danger is that Ukraine has a history of muddling through with policy steps," said Andreas Schwabe, an analyst at Raiffeisen Bank International AG in Vienna, which has a hold rating on the bonds. "Authorities have said that they think Ukraine can issue debt without the IMF, which they can probably do, but it will be more expensive."